.
Feedback

Is the Republican Party the Anti-Empathy Party?

The way to choose a candidate for political office is to examine their capacity for empathy. That is if you wish to avoid years of unbearable distress.

There is a remarkably striking similarity between how it is advisable to examine a new psychiatrist and the way you might choose a candidate for political office; that is if you wish to avoid years of unbearable distress. 

First, some background information about possibly the most important neuro-scientific discovery of the past decade: Empathy Cells.

In the early 1990s, Italian researchers discovered a new type of nerve cell in the brain of monkeys, which are now called mirror neurons. When a monkey watched a researcher eat an ice cream; neurons fired. Then those same cells fired when the monkey ate the ice cream. In other words, the monkey reacted with “empathy” when observing the researcher eating. 

Eventually this led to the discovery that humans have incredibly sophisticated mirror neurons, which allow us to understand the actions, emotions and experiences of others. In short, mirror neurons allow us to empathically grasp what other people feel by emotionally “getting it” rather than with rational thinking alone. 

Empathy and the Candidate for National Office 

While scientists have measured the empathy in apes, no such test has been given to politicians.

A candidate for national office should be able to empathically understand what it means to be unemployed or go hungry.

A candidate should have a genuine interest in learning more about the millions of Americans who suffer and possess a desire to help those in distress.

A politician should be highly sensitive to the oppression, discrimination and racism that saturates our history. This requires empathy

The Empathy Gap

Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan and their Republican supporters, rather than expressing a desire to experience the world of those culturally different and deprived with the intention of assisting them, seem intent on depriving the average American of  security. Take the Ryan Budget plan which Mitt Romney extols:

1. It eviscerates the programs and services we depend on while gifting a handsome tax cut to the richest Americans. These include healthcare services, banking and clean water regulations, road repair and education assistance.

2. More than three-fifths of the cuts proposed by Mr. Ryan come from programs for low-income Americans. That means billions of dollars lost for job training for the displaced, Pell grants for students and food stamps for the hungry.Federal help will not be there when a city is unable to replace a crumbling bridge.

3. These cuts are so severe that the nation’s Catholic bishops raised their voices in protest at the shredding of the nation’s moral obligations. Mr. Ryan’s budget “will hurt hungry children, poor families, vulnerable seniors and workers who cannot find employment,” the bishops wrote in an April letter to the House. “These cuts are unjustified and wrong.”

4. Mr. Ryan believes with an obvious lack of empathy that his budget helps poor by” eliminating their dependence on the government”. And yet he has failed to explain how he would magically make them self-sufficient by cutting aid to state governments by 20 percent.

5. Mr. Ryan has drawn a blueprint of a government that will be absent when people need it the most. It will not be there when the unemployed need job training, or when a financially struggling student needs help to get into college.

6. People might agree that we need to balance our budget and shrink government. But how will we feel we realize Mr. Ryan plans take away our new sewage treatment plants, the asphalt for our streets, and the replacements for retiring police officers and firefighters.

7. All of this will be accompanied, of course, by even greater tax giveaways to the rich, and extravagant benefits to powerful military contractors. Business leaders will be granted their wish for severely diminished watchdogs

8. The Ryan budget would do damage not just to the poor but to the middle class as well. As he wrote euphemistically, "the key to pro-growth tax reform is lowering tax rates while broadening the tax base."

9. Ryan advocates cutting the top income tax rate to 25% .The only way to do so while keeping overall tax revenues at 19% of gross domestic product, In fact, the most popular breaks save billions for the middle class. 

10. More than 70% of the mortgage interest payments claimed as deductions ($240 billion) appear on returns filed by people in the income range of $60,000 to $200,000, according to the IRS. Many of these middle-class homeowners base their annual financial planning on tax breaks such as the mortgage deduction. Only about 1.4% of the total is claimed by taxpayers earning $1 million or more.

11. The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center recently calculated, sharply lowering marginal rates while cutting out the most popular tax breaks results means they are coming after all of us except for their wealthy friends.

12. Ryan would replace the existing Medicare system of guaranteed treatment (with a nominal individual premium) with one providing vouchers for service through private commercial insurance plans. By design, the vouchers wouldn't cover all costs, and because their value would rise in accordance with a standard inflation measure, not with medical inflation, the gap would widen over time.

Republican number crunchers like Romney and Ryan have the least empathy. You can bet your last dollar, and you can bet it will be your last dollar, they will be silent when the elderly cannot keep up with the costs of M.R.I.’s or prescription medicines, or when the poor and uninsured become increasingly sick through lack of preventive care.

I don’t have the data to support my thesis that Conservative Republicans suffer from a brain empathy deficit disorder.  But I can quote Maureen Dowd who said on August 14 that Paul Ryan is, “the cutest package that cruelty ever came in.”

farm guy August 22, 2012 at 12:37 am
I agree with Bill. This is a very weak article. Where are the sources?
farm guy August 22, 2012 at 12:42 am
Geeze, Mr. Ziemba, I really did think you were describing Obama until you named Paul Ryan. How is it that two people can see things completely opposite?
farm guy August 22, 2012 at 12:47 am
GregoryRobertsSamuels- Again another study referenced. Which study are you refering to? There's also a study that the majority of those unemployed are liberals..
Andrew Ziemba August 22, 2012 at 01:43 am
I don't watch the news on TV. I certainly don't watch Fox news, as that is garbage flooded with Neocon establishment scum.
It is absolutely disgusting to subsidize any corporation big or small. I am strongly opposed to propping up Exxon. The poor are responsible for squeezing the middle class out of existence. I don't know if you realize how much in taxes goes to subsidize people who qualify for government subsidies. At the very least, I think that you would have to agree that this is a factor that is hurting the middle class. It is so shocking to see people talk about businesses who outsource to china. They have to choice! I guess they could go out of business... They will do what makes sense for their business to grow. If they could afford to, they would do business in America and all of the poor people could work at those companies. Unfortunately democrats and republicans don't care about people, rights, laws, or businesses. This isn't even debatable... republicans and democrats do not care about you or me and they certainly don't care about business. They only care about being elected and supporting their base. The business owner is a VERY small minority in both parties, and the majority of them agree that there is too much regulation on business and too many taxes as well. Seriously though, who pays to prop up the poor. Answer that please. After all, I know how much you hate the rich because you probably feel they aren't paying their fair share.
Leslie Hutchison August 22, 2012 at 01:57 am
I'm going to remind the commenters to stay on topic and not attack one another. Capice?
Franky Camper August 22, 2012 at 02:08 am
If only Americans, all genders, could simply rely on their bodies to 'shut down' as a means of selfprotection from Washington's constant raping of democracy, then fools like you guys above might turn your attention to something you might stand a chance at fixing - GROTON!
If there were a god he/she/it would put aside the triviality of the universe and speak to each and everyone of you, by name I'm sure, and tell you, "Washington is a lost cause. Set your sights on something winnable- fixing Groton." Now get to work!
James Bond August 22, 2012 at 02:34 am
I like Kelly.Are you an elected offical anywhere? You're one of the few here that posts smart to the point thoughts and you do it with grace and style. Good job!!
wtfdrez August 22, 2012 at 03:41 am
Paul Ryan came from a priviledged background? Really??? wow you are reaching sista . Maria, you know what, you're the problem,because people like you can say anything about anyone, and some dummies believe you. I think you're priviledged, and i heard that you tourture puppies. see what I mean?
J. Sosallter August 22, 2012 at 11:10 am
Regarding Paul Ryan's background; see below back-up article -
Ryan comes from a long established WI family with money: "Janesville, Wisconsin, where Ryan was born and still lives, is a riverfront city of sixty-four thousand people in the southeast corner of the state, between Madison and Chicago. Three families, the Ryans, the Fitzgeralds, and the Cullens, sometimes called the Irish Mafia, helped develop the town, especially in the postwar era. The Ryans were major road builders, and today Ryan, Inc., started in 1884 by Paul’s great-grandfather, is a national construction firm." Ryan has no private sector experience, except in his own family's business (never looked for a job) "Ryan went back to Wisconsin, worked briefly for the family business as a “marketing consultant”—a bit of résumé padding that gave him his only private-sector experience—and decided to run [for Congressional office]" Ryan's home district got significant stimulus funding under the present administration: "John Beckord, a Ryan supporter and the head of Forward Janesville, a pro-business economic-development group, explained that it would soon house the Janesville Innovation Center, providing entrepreneurs with commercial space in which to launch their ideas. The money came from a $1.2-million government grant through the Economic Development Administration, one of Obama’s major stimulus programs." Read more http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/08/06/120806fa_fact_lizza#ixzz23uwQXbPv
Maria Giannuzzi August 22, 2012 at 11:56 am
Thank you for this information. It's nice to know Congressman Ryan does not favor sacrifice for his hometown. I wonder how he feels about the hometowns of the rest of us.
Maria Giannuzzi August 22, 2012 at 11:58 am
Excellent advice. Much good can come from focusing on and helping our communities. Act locally. Fix Groton and the rest of Connecticut's communities.
Maria Giannuzzi August 22, 2012 at 11:59 am
My understanding is that Congressman Ryan's father was an attorney.
Maria Giannuzzi August 22, 2012 at 12:09 pm
My comment was based on Mr. Ryan's and Mr. Romney's family backgrounds and facts provided in their resumes. Perhaps you should check their resumes and the facts before making ridiculous comments, which no intelligent person will take seriously. You are only making yourself look small-minded--as well as incompetent.
Emily August 22, 2012 at 12:12 pm
I just wonder what budget you would like to see passed. 3+ years with no budget from Democrats while House Republicans have at least put something forward. I don't like either of the parties because they are really just different versions of each other and offer nothing positive to normal american people. They exist only to perpetuate themselves. I will be voting for Gary Johnson in November and I will sleep with a clear conscience.
Maria Giannuzzi August 22, 2012 at 12:14 pm
Thank you, Leslie, for bringing back memories of the language of la bella Italia.
Maria Giannuzzi August 22, 2012 at 12:17 pm
And what a foolish comment by Congressman Alter (spelling?) of Missouri. I believe he is on the Science Committee in the House.
Maria Giannuzzi August 22, 2012 at 12:24 pm
And before running for Congress, Mr. Ryan worked for a short time at various think tanks. I also believe he worked for a short time as a staffer on the Hill (for Congress). These are very good jobs, with excellent salaries and benefits, including great health insurance. Of course, his government salary and benefits would have been paid for by the U.S. taxpayer.
Maria Giannuzzi August 22, 2012 at 12:27 pm
My understanding is that President Obama has put forth a budget, but whether it is for 2014 or another year I don't know.
Maria Giannuzzi August 22, 2012 at 12:30 pm
Neither critic has put forth any facts or other information. They just attack the messenger. Well, if I am wrong, put up those facts.
Bill Fasula August 22, 2012 at 12:34 pm
Leslie, I think this blog is a bigoted attack on a group of people. Why don't you start there!
Maria Giannuzzi August 22, 2012 at 12:43 pm
Sorry, it is Congressman Todd Akin from Missouri, not "Alter."
J. Sosallter August 22, 2012 at 12:47 pm
Staffer salaries are not really considered excellent - inexperienced staffers are really tracking starting administrative asst salaries in the DC area or lower. I think the significance is that Ryan's career is essentially only as elected official or employee of elected official, with minimal private sector experience (and that was in a family owned business). And circling back to topic, would that serve to make him in any greater touch with average, unconnected Americans who have to seek work and get buffeted by the winds of economics wholly outside their ability to influence?
http://www.legistorm.com/salaries/house_totals.html
John Yannacci, Sr. August 22, 2012 at 12:53 pm
James Bond, that's the same excuse that Dan Rather used when he offered up phoney documentation of George Bush's military service: "Just because the documentation is false doesn't make the story false." Just another "the end justifies the means" smear tactic.
bernie August 22, 2012 at 01:20 pm
The Hegelian dialectic serves as the basis for the modern paradigm of Left / Right politics. Thesis versus Antithesis. In this case, individual liberty versus social responsibilities. All modern politics are divided along these two equally valid (but individually unsustainable) schools of thought. The inevitable synthesis arrived at over time through endless compromises in the political cycle is the realization of an absolute idea far removed from the original intent of either party: collectivism imposed by a totalitarian system. People need to put aside partizan bickering and think outside of the artificial construct of the two party system, which was implemented by design. They need to see the big picture as to where this is all heading. Wake up.
Jessica Keller August 22, 2012 at 01:24 pm
After reading many of these comments I am reassured that, as good Americans, we will not be monkeys and eat ice cream because the researcher did...what if the researcher pulled out a gun?
Alphonse DeLachance August 22, 2012 at 01:26 pm
Murphy may well lose badly to McMahon. It will be the main event this year. Smack down in Connecticut.
R Eleveld August 22, 2012 at 01:37 pm
Point #10 is correct.
000 August 22, 2012 at 01:56 pm
Boys and girls, this is the proper way to address the topic.
The question was "Is the Republican Party the Anti-Empathy Party? " In order to prove any party is "anti-empathy" you need to cite evidence substantiating this claim. In other words, give examples, give PROOF of anti-empathy. Here are RECENT examples of anti-empathy, specificaly, US drones murdering RESCUERS (remember, this strongly suggests if not proves anti-empathy) then attribute to which party responsibility belongs; "On [4 June], US drones attacked rescuers in Waziristan in western Pakistan minutes after an initial strike, killing 16 people in total according to the BBC. On 28 May, drones were also reported to have returned to the attack in Khassokhel near Mir Ali." Moreover, "between May 2009 and June 2011, at least 15 attacks on rescuers were reported by credible news media, including the New York Times, CNN, ABC News and Al Jazeera." http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/20/us-drones-strikes-target-rescuers-pakistan Since neither the GOP or the DemocRats are objecting to these horrific war crimes and both parties further them by voting for, funding and not stopping or even speaking against them, the only conclusion can be both parties are the "anti-empathy" party. This is just one example. Repeat process. P.S. There is NO real difference btwn. the 2 major parties and if there is, please cite evidence before you claim that there isn't.
R Eleveld August 22, 2012 at 01:57 pm
I will add, that there was an article I recently read about a hereditary factor to political persuasion that was interesting. It has nothing really to do with Avi's rant.
Avi's piece was meant to spread hate and had no real value other than to get all you guys to write to each other. He has every right to write what he wants. I have every right to ignore his comments. I also have the right to express an opinion that Avi's comments are not worth the time it took to read. You guys all jumped onto his bait. I think it is more advisable to label it for what it was meant to be, a piece to bring the commentors out. 160 comments and a ton of vitriol.
Rick McDonald August 22, 2012 at 02:01 pm
Yes it is sad to see how much the President and family are sacrificing.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Cheshire Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something