Take a look at some of the presidents who are considered "great" by historians. Certain of their actions may have you rethinking their inclusion on the country's honor roll.
Jackson:
Andrew Jackson is considered by some historians as one of our greatest presidents, but he managed with an economy of effort to leave a legacy that included vetoing the recharter of the Bank of the United States. This set off a chain reaction of economic instability culminating in Jackson issuing an order that required buyers of public land to pay in gold, thereby precipitating the Panic of 1837.
Jackson's most notorious act in eight years of the presidency was his support of The Indian Removal Act. Jackson was responsible for the forced march of 15,000 Cherokees from Georgia to a reservation in Oklahoma. One out of four died en route on what is called the "Trail of Tears."
Thomas Jefferson said it well when he stated that Jackson “is a dangerous man.” But Jackson defined himself more specifically in 1821: “ I know what I am fit for. I can command a body of men in a rough way; but I am not fit to be president.”
Reagan:
After his inauguration, President Ronald Reagan placed a portrait of Calvin Coolidge in the Oval Office. He praised Coolidge’s political style andhands-off leadership for producing seven years of prosperity, peace, and balanced budgets.
This symbolic act foretold both the style and legacy of the Reagan presidency. In his first Inaugural Address, regarding the country's economic malaise Reagan stated, “In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problems; government is the problem.”
Coolidge:
Indeed, Coolidge’s policies were based on an almost religious belief in
doing nothing. Coolidge said it best: “It is much more important to kill bad bills
than to pass good ones.” “Don't you know that four fifths of all our troubles in
this life would disappear if we would just sit down and keep still?”
Coolidge was also a worshipper of capitalism. Again, he said it clearly, “The man who builds a factory builds a temple, that the man who works there worships there, and to each is due, not scorn and blame, but reverence and praise.” , and, “Don’t expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong.”
The economic collapse of the Great Depression were directly related to Coolidge’s
policies; a familiar recipe of tax cuts for the wealthy leading to an uneven
distribution of wealth, failure to aid the agricultural sector, the resultant bankruptcy of thousands rural banks, the loss of land by thousands of farmers and an adamant refusal to regulate business inevitably led to disaster.
Hoover:
Herbert Hoover, who followed Coolidge as president, reacted to the October 24 1929 stock market crash stating that, "the fundamental business of the country, that is production and distribution, is on a sound and prosperous basis.”
Hoover’s actions in the wake of the stock market crash were premised on his
belief that the economy faced a mere downturn rather than the prospect of
complete collapse. Likewise, Hoover's actions accorded with his faith in
voluntarism and rejected calls for more aggressive government actions (like relief bills or bond sales to fund unemployment benefits.) He opposed federal intervention in the economy or the construction of a welfare state.
Hoover wanted to close the federal government's budget deficit, which had grown during his presidency, by raising taxes. Hoover and his advisers did not want to raise taxes primarily on wealthy Americans and businesses because they were the job creator. Instead he wanted to spread tax increases between rich and poor Americans.
Congress passed (over Hoover's veto) the Bonus Bill in the winter of 1931.
The bill allowed veterans to borrow up to one-half the value of life insurance
policies that Congress had purchased in 1924; with the policies set to mature
in 1945. Early access to these funds came to be regarded as a
"bonus."
In the summer of 1932, several thousand unemployed men, many of them veterans of World War I, gathered and camped in Washington to demand immediate payment of war bonuses amid widespread sympathy for their plight.
On July 29, Hoover issued written orders to Chief of Staff MacArthur to clear and destroy the camp. The military led by MacArthur, and his assistant Dwight Eisenhower, attacked the veterans with tanks, tear gas, bayonets, and guns and burned the camps killing one bonus army member. Americans from around the nation saw the horrific images of the attack in their newspapers.
MItt Romney to speak to NAACP today. Why bother? From the left: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/07/romney-naacp From the Right: http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2012/07/11/romney_to_address_naacp_convention_wednesday
"Tax evasion"? Is that the new liberal talking point theme? I see you failed with the whole "Swiss Bank Account" attacks, and the Bain Capital attacks and the war on women and what else? Romney is going to speak to the NAACP today. Can we rely on the left to use racism as their latest talking point? I mean, obviously, since Romney is white, he's a racist. Tedious.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/03/12/santorum-co-chair-romney-should-renounce-his-racist-mormon-religion/
They are restricted to have certain guns,certain ammunition etc. "Laws were put into place that restricted ownership of high-capacity magazines: limiting handguns to ten rounds, and most semi-automatic centre-fire rifles to five rounds". "You make "stockpiling" sound bad.
As for Jimmy Carter, I'll certainly agree with you that he is a true humanitarian. He is an extremely bright man as well, graduating near the top of his class from the U.S. Naval Acedemy. He was, however, not a very good President, and that's one of the primary reasons why he wasn't re-elected. As for Obama "fighting for the people", you gotta be kidding me! He has done nothing but placate a select group within his political party, he doesn't fight for the people. If he did, he would attempt to lower taxes (not raise them with Obamacare and then call it a penalty, not a tax), reduce government spending (and not burden our children and grandchildren with mountains of debt), and create a business friendly political environment that would enable our economy to thrive! We need a proven leader (not a community organizer) that has successfully run an organization, balanced a budget, and can make the tough decisions for the country as a whole, not just a select group within his political party. Obama has proven that he is not up to the task of any of these. It's time to give someone else a chance, anyone, and it looks like Mitt Romney is the person best positioned to send Obama back to Chicago! Anyone But Obama (ABO) 2012
Congratulations! You are the first to bring up Romney's Mormonism as a 'political tactic'. I have researched the history of Mormonism and their racist beliefs. It wasn't until 1978 that they changed their doctrine on black people. http://www.religioustolerance.org/lds_race.htm And your point is....? I mean, if you want to throw down racism from an organization and their ties to a political figure as a reason to not vote for that person, shall we bring up the ties that President Obama has to Jeremiah Wright and The New Black Panther Panties Party, which are more recent than 1978? http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/05/hate_group_associations_disqualify_obama.html We can play tit-for-tat all day, Rick. The truth is, our current sitting President has verifiable proof against him that he is not comfortable with white folks in America, based on his associations. Ouch.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/07/10/156509668/scranton-workers-see-pay-slashed-to-minimum-wage Third CA city seeks Bankruptcy Protection http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303740704577520622501939392.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Untouchable Pensions May Be Tested in California http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/17/business/untouchable-pensions-in-california-may-be-put-to-the-test.html?pagewanted=all Frank Church Committee hearings - Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_Committee Knapp Commission Wikipedia (This has been revised - partly cover up scope) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knapp_Commission Godfather + Serpico + American Gangster based on original findings Ralph Nader - WIKIPEDIA = Note LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS by his ORGANIZATION http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Nader RON PAUL - WIKIPEDIA - (real - it seems so? One can hope) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Paul JESSE VENTURA - WIKIPEDIA (Wacko or PRESCIENT?) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Ventura http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_Theory_with_Jesse_Ventura President DWIGHT D EISENHOWER (Wacko or PRESCIENT) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwight_D._Eisenhower TEXT & VIDEO = Jan 17, 2012 Fairwell http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/dwightdeisenhowerfarewell.html MARSHALL PLAN - WIKPEDIA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Plan http://www.marshallfoundation.org/library/index_av.html
Obama has lied about almost everything that he ran on. All said, he has lied more than Bush (which to me is shocking.) Obama has been the most racist president we have ever had. His entire administration is openly racist...just look at the Trayvon Martin situation, wow! Obama has ruled as a dictator much more so than EVEN BUSH ever did. He totally ignored congress and the senate, often stating that if they did nothing, he would do whatever he wants to do to make his plans happen. Obama rules almost completely with executive order! He claims that the constitution is flawed, and so he basically just ignores it as much as Americans will allow him to. Unfortunately Americans don't care enough yet to have him impeached. I mean Bush was TERRIBLE, but wow, Obama is just a bit worse than him because of all of the above mentioned. Not only that, but look, I mean Obama said he was going to end all of these horrible things like secret prisons and wars overseas. Come on people, wake up. At least vote 3rd party in 2012. No more lesser of two evils, never again...
Consider the guy who makes 1 mio and the guy who makes 60k. The million guy pays 250k in federal tax. 60k guy about 9k. Give the 60k guy a 40% tx break. Give the mio guy a 1% break. The 60 guy now pays 5500 . The mio guy pays 240k. So the million guy got a bigger break! 1% vs 40% yet the left calls that unfair and the rich got richer. To me thats crap.but whata worse is obama is villifying the 250 guy and saying the zero payer is fair. Do you realize how stupid that is?
Okay, let us talk about tax evasion, then. If I do not pay taxes, would you say this makes me a tax-evader? If so, then consider this: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/02/19/chart-of-the-week-nearly-half-of-all-americans-dont-pay-income-taxes/ How many Americans are tax-evaders, and how many of these tax-evaders are on government-assistance? So if a fella who has money has legal (totally legal, by the way) tax shelters to protect his wealth from the government, how does this make that person a tax-evader? Like being able to invest 100 dollars and making it into 200 dollars is vilified by the liberals, unless it's them doing it, I find it disappointing that this class warfare theme continues for the liberals to beat upon like a dead horse they think is a drum circle during an Occupy protest. Tedious.
With a straight face? LOL! Impossible. Of course, I am waiting for the anti-gay rhetoric to come your way since you used the term 'straight' which obviously means you are 'homophobic'. Ha! Why's it gotta be a 'straight face'? Can't it be a 'gay face'? Hater! LOL! Just playing with you, Luca....
Didn't the bible teach you anything?
I do help the poor and homeless, here, in my little slice of CT, of my own volition and of my own choosing. Not because you and the 'emotion-card-throwing' liberals demand I do it. Charity is charity; tax is tax. One comes from the spirit; the other comes from a corrupt government. Jesus said there would always be poor among us. I do what I can in my local sphere of influence, but I am not interested in caring for the poor and homeless in, let's say, CA. Let Californians take care of their own. All Hail The Living God of Israel.
i dont watch fox news. I wouldnt recognize hannity or beck or limbaugh if they were standing next to me. Instead of the hackneyed response that denies facts by referencing fox....why not prove that 50% ish dont pay federal income tax. ( note...i say gederal income tax. Not fica or sales tax) Your turn to correct rather than dismiss. Tks. Wjete do u het yoir news from? And the bankruptcies in calif vs wisconsin recall....are republicans crazy to go for reform?
"Mitt Romney offered a direct appeal to African-American voters on Wednesday, arguing in a speech at the NAACP's annual meeting that the black community has been hardest hit by the bad economy and that, if elected, he'll seek to improve the quality of life for all Americans, regardless of color." Ooops. Wrong, Mitt. The NAACP doesn't want to hear you want to view Americans regardless of their color. http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/mitt-romney-appeals-black-voters-naacp-speech-141523941.html
Its suicidal...and all with the notion that rich people shouldmt be rich. my suggestion is move to darfur. Not manu rich to jate...so thats close to utopia.
For those of us who do not care about politics, it ruins the website. We have to sift through hundreds of these comments to find the one story we care about.
Ill ne here waiting for your correcting links with respect to my contention that 50 ish % of americans dont pay taxed. If you discover im correct, and feel as though principles like honesty are something to vale ( liberals always want to assume the moral high ground...yet mysteriously vanish when personal morality is required)...you can issue an apology or acknowledgement. Im no fox news follower....but just because fox teports it doesnt mean its wro.g.
He flatters his fellow traveler leftist, but totally ignore the "FACTS" he claims to want when they are posted by Donald, in much greater abundance, no less! Michael and his cohort do NOT really want facts, the TRUTH, such as that every big socialist, 'cradle-to-grave NANNY state' country is now BANKRUPT (such as Italy, Spain, and Greece) or soon to arrive there! If people really do not fear truth and facts, then they would read/listen to alternate sources instead of media matters, think progress etc. and turn to, for instance, TheBlaze.com, The American Spectator, Canada Free Press, TownHall.com, Breitbart.com and so many more on line sources of info which the msm totally igores.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz, on the other hand, is an angry hypocrite who herself has investments in Switzerland, and Valerie Jarret has money in Bermuda. Much more significantly, Obama has lied many times about his background and other promises he has made, and his STIMULUS sent 39 BILLIONS of our TAX $$$$ to FOREIGN countries!!!! His campaign has also outsourced jobs to India!!