Congressional Republicans have repeatedly wasted taxpayer money voting to rescind what they derisively call Obamacare. I wonder if women take offense at the fact that as of this week, 47 million women will be finally able to access preventative health care without having to make a co-payment to the doctor.
Among the services are covered are: an annual check-up for adult women to get recommended preventive services; gestational diabetes screening for women 24 to 28 weeks pregnant, and those at high risk of developing gestational diabetes; breastfeeding support; supplies, and counseling for pregnant and postpartum women; and domestic violence screening and counseling for all adolescent and adult women. (An estimated 25 percent of U.S. women report being targets of intimate partner violence during their lifetime.)
The party of Lincoln has attempted to impose their anti-love agenda to all areas of our lives. I wonder if this is causing Abraham Lincoln to repeatedly turn in his grave as if he were a rotisserie chicken.
It is time for the Republican Party to unveil a new set of Ten Commandments:
1. The Ten Commandments in the Old Testament begins with, “Remember, I am the Lord who took you out of Egypt.” In thirty six places the Old Testament reminds its readers to treat the stranger kindly reiterating, “Remember, you were once strangers in Egypt.” Substitute instead, “Remember that your ancestors were once wealthy European landowners. Do not treat strangers well.”
2. In place of not taking the Lord’s name in vain substitute, “Frequently invoke God’s name to promote your ends.”
3. In the Book of Exodus and again in Deuteronomy it states: “Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the Sabbath in order that your workers and animals will be able to rest. Instead substitute, “Thou shall not raise the minimum wage nor allow workers to protect themselves against employers.”
4. Replace “Respect your parents”, “Follow the Tea Party leadership blindly, even if it is counter to your interests”.
5. Instead of the commandment not to commit murder, substitute, “Fill your homes with weapons. Do not kill the unborn but ignore the plight of the living.”
6. Replace “Do not steal”, with “Protect the wealthy and squeeze the middle class by having them carry the tax burden.”
7. Replace “Do not testify falsely under oath” with “Trample on the facts and vilify President Obama any way you can. Take bribes from lobbyists and violate your oath of office.”
8. Replace “Do not covet your neighbor’s home” with, “Let our infrastructure crumble and destroy the infrastructure of other countries.”
Abraham Lincoln repeatedly stated the following principle: The Constitution was made to put into action the principle stated in the Declaration of Independence that, “All men are created equal”. He stated in his July 4th 1861 message to Congress that the main object of the federal government, “is to elevate the condition of men; to afford all an unfettered start and a fair chance in the race of life.”
9. The party of Lincoln has an alternate vision and principle. “The federal government’s role is to refrain from elevating the condition of man and to not afford all an unfettered start and a fair chance in the race of life.”
Not long before he was murdered, Lincoln stated his concern that the power of corporations would be the ultimate undoing of the Union.
10. The party of Lincoln is trying as hard as they can to turn Lincoln into a prophet. I suggest as their final commandment “Let corporate interests operate unfettered no matter the cost in human suffering.”
Sadly, everything Avi says is true.
You write that Social Security has been a success because it has keep "legions of seniors out of the ranks of the poor...". Your ignorance is all too clear. It has been a "success" because it is doing what it was designed to do: Keep seniors poor AND dependent on the government. Instead of working, investing, and living within their means, the government has promised to take care of "legions" of dependents who will faithfully vote to keep their Masters in power.
Here is the real one. Apologies for the mistake. http://www.salon.com/2012/08/05/republicans_slouching_toward_theocracy/
I would encourage any advertisers to stop advertising on this crap site, but since it's primarilly Obama's campaign that advertises on here, that will do no good.
And those of us who have had investments know that the value of investments go up and down, and they can really go down. And if you happen to retire during a down period, you are in deep trouble because you may not only lose your return, but a great deal of your principal as well. I certainly wouldn't want you as my investment advisor.
Why do you think Congress goes to all the trouble of giving you these deductions and credits? Why do you think the tax code has so many of them? It wasn't just to keep accountants steadily employed.
Prior to Social Security the extended family was the responsibility of the family and the community. Elderly people were held in a position of respect. The family took care of them. The long term unintended consequence of SS is that families no longer had to take care of their own as was the case before the 1930's. Is that good or bad? You can decide. You characterization is insulting to millions of those that took care of the elderly. Maybe that scenario was your familial experience as it seems quite specific like from personal experience. I am absolutely sure the majority were held in high regard and taken care of by those that loved and cared for them. You then go into deduction envy again… same old saw. Nothing needs to be added. As I have said a flat tax with no deductions is the long term fairest approach. Also FYI less than 50% of those that file returns have a mortgage or any other deductions. Also accountants love these things. Then Maria you go on with the “far tight” comments. Privatization is a concept that might be applied to those under the age of 40 or 50. It clearly has nothing to do with your 80 y.o. granny. To say otherwise is propaganda form the far left. The investment programs that have been discussed are very limited within clearly defined Federal requirements.
The fact is those that collecting SSI are receiving it from the current payments we make into FICA taxes and other taxes. It is a pass through system. It was and is from day 1. The whole “trust” comment is plainly disingenuous. It is claimed that when FDR discussed SS he said that as long as people pay into this system it will have to be funded by the government no matter what happens. Those prophetic words are so true. (No source is available but that should be OK with Maria)
It smacks of your desperation also, which I guess is not surprising, since you may sense that your misguided "social justice" demands are now on the losing side, which will be proved again in November. More importantly than your miffed feelings, the "New Road to Serfdom" which Obama and other career politicians (both parties) have had us on in recent decades has BANKRUPTED our nation! It has come from that wrong-headed and un-Constitutional view that people are "entitled" to force others, by government mandate, to PAY for their housing, food, and medical care, and to feed and support their children! PLEASE at least inform yourself as to what an "entitlement" is! I know you hate taking away from your 'spewing your opinions' time on Patch, but you might at least hope to convince someone if you did not make so many factual mistakes. http://www.auburn.edu/~johnspm/gloss/entitlement_program ** People don't have to be "toothless" if they use decent dental hygiene including daily flossing, and avoiding excess sweets and sodas! Your constant use of hyperbole and straw man arguments is tiresome in the "extreme."
I learned yesterday that Harry Truman was the first person to be signed up for Medicare. I also learned that in 1948 President Truman was calling for universal health care for all Americans.
I really don't know what the point of privatizing Social Security is then. Anyone is free to invest now if they have the extra cash. If you don't have the extra cash, I would think it would be very foolish to gamble with your limited Social Security contributions.
http://www.auburn.edu/~johnspm/gloss/entitlement_program People using legitimate, congress passed tax incentives, deductions etc. (such as for mortgage interest and charitable donations) are NOT receiving "entitlements." If you will read the above article then you will be better informed as to the difference. Also, when you blast people who receive more than they put into SS--which is usually the case, and probably will be for YOU, too--you are neglecting to acknowledge the fact that their employers also matched the contribution for the employee, into SS! And the fact that if the person's contributions had been in a savings or investment account, it would have accrued interest/dividends/cap. gains. etc. Personally, I am old enough to take a reduced SS income now, but probably won't take any SS until after the age of 70. As I don't have children, and SS survivor benefits for children only apply to minors anyway, if I die before receiving any SS, all of my contributions, and my employers' for me, will go to "Others" and "Strangers"! I will thus receive nothing of that to which I am rightly "entitled," Maria. It is odd that you urge others to look further when they disagree with your opinions, but you won't extend the same courtesy, or admit it when you are proven wrong.
" if I die before receiving any SS, all of my contributions, and my employers' for me, will go to "Others" and "Strangers"!" Social Security is for all intents and purposes and always has been a pay as you go system. You send in your $1,000 and it immediately goes out the the then current beneficiaries. We originally had 20 workers per beneficiary so a $1 benefit cost the 20 workers $0.05. Today we have fewer than 5 and by some estimates 3 workers per beneficiary and that works out to $0.20 to $0.33 per $1 in benefit. Now many will say that there are trust funds that have money to support benefits. Yes and well No. Excess FICA taxes were "invested" in special treasury SS Bonds, that in theory could be used to support SS benefits at a later date. The Treasury issues these special Bonds and uses the money to fund government expenses. Reality check. You need to run a budget surplus in order to retire debt. You need to earn more than you spend to retire debt (pay of SSI) or you need to pay principal and interest like a mortgage payment. The government does not do that. There is the rub.