Concerns Remain as Schools Continue to Unfold Safety Measures

Southington School Superintendent Joseph Erardi said the district must be cautious to avoid a knee-jerk reaction after the Newtown school shooting and support "sustainable, reasonable and meaningful changes" in school safety measures.

The most effective plan for school safety is built 1 percent at a time and to be effective, any changes must be sustainable, reasonable and meaningful.

That was the message that School Superintendent Joseph V. Erardi Jr. delivered to a group of nearly 100 parents at the Derynoski Elementary School as the Southington Board of Education and Southington Police Department hosted a community safety forum Tuesday evening.

“I can’t say what every long-term change will be, but safety is the Board of Educations trump card. Safety trumps everything that they do,” Erardi said. “We are not doing this to make people feel better. We are here because we want to assure the safety of our children, not just today but for tomorrow and the future.”

The program, an ongoing community discussion sparked by the tragic shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown on Dec. 14 that left 20 children and six educators dead, proved an important chance for residents to learn about a three-phase effort to better secure Southington schools, some of which has already been implemented, according to officials.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

The schools have already begun “immediate and sustainable changes,” Erardi said.

The second phase, which involves central office staff, involves creating a long-range plan to be delivered by June 30 and the third includes creating further community partnerships between residents and the Board of Education.

The district is also conducting constant planned drills, which will be directly announced to students to prevent fear, at all schools including practicing lockdowns. These efforts are already underway, with a planned drill this week at Southington High School.

But the efforts haven’t been enough for some parents, who stepped up to the podium and said it is still too easy for strangers to enter the schools without identifying themselves properly.

Three parents indicated that they have entered the schools during the school day and had the opportunity to just enter the building despite and existing requirement that all doors remain locked. One also said he was able to enter through three locations at one of the schools, even while school was in session.

“I walked into one of the schools during the day last week and was never asked to identify myself. The kids were in the cafeteria. What could have happened?” one participant asked.

Erardi told the woman he would investigate the ability to roam free into the school, which remained unnamed, immediately and that the district would continue to implement immediate change.

Erardi and members of the Board of Education cautioned, however, that knee-jerk reactions such as placing armed guards and metal detectors at each school immediately would not serve to curb the fears expressed by residents since the December tragedy.

“I can’t speak for the Board of Education, but I am not in favor of metal detectors. It won’t serve to prevent a tragedy like what occurred (at Sandy Hook),” Erardi said.

The district isn’t working alone to implement changes either. Southington Police Lt. Lowell DePalma said the police department has a plan in place to address all kinds of emergency situations and has taken steps to improve police presence immediately. The department has instructed officers to walk within the schools and said an officer has been to every classroom since the tragedy. Officers are also instructed to work on their reports from school grounds rather than at the department or other points in town.

In addition, officers are equipped with a blueprint of every school, contained on laptops that accompany each officer in their patrol cars.

DePalma also encouraged residents to not be afraid to speak up, even if they an unsure whether an individual is actually suspicious.

“People always say to us ‘we know you are busy and have better things to do.’ That’s baloney,” DePalma said. “It’s our job to check on these things, to make sure we know who’s who and who belongs. We want people to speak up, even if they just aren’t sure.”

The efforts are a good start, said Stacey Pillsbury, but she questioned if enough is being done in order to prepare for situations that could potentially be even worse than what occurred with Adam Lanza in Newtown.

“What if he set fire to the school to lure the children out first? Are we thinking of more complex scenarios?” she asked.

DePalma assured Pillsbury that the department is constantly undergoing training and discussing the “what ifs” and how to respond to each school individually for the fastest and most effective response during an emergency situation.

Pillsbury also made another point, however, and one well received by those at the forum Tuesday: Community involvement will remain a key point in school safety and all parents should be asked from birth on, what is your plan?

“At the first meeting (the Sunday following the Newtown tragedy), the entire board sat here and listened as hundreds came to express their concerns,” said Board of Education chairman Brian Goralski said. “Tonight, we are privileged, as a full board, to hear from the community again.”

“The most important thing for us is you, the community. There is nothing we take more seriously than the safety and security of our buildings and everyone who uses them,” he said.

Have enough measures been taken at Southington schools to assure safety? What steps would you have implemented to improve security?

Make sure to like Southington Patch on Facebook and follow on Twitter for breaking news, daily updates and more!

Mark G January 30, 2013 at 11:38 AM
You know, citizens, from what I gather, I think we have been handed a load of baloney regarding the great safety accorded our schools. Why on earth would Mr. Erardi and others want to avoid knee-jerk reactions if there's not much that needs to be done? One would think that we have just some touch up work to do if things are pretty secure. Why does he recommend a gradual (1-percent at a time) implementation of security if we already have good security? Maybe because we're spending our funds on frivolities like plastic grass and climbing walls. This meeting implies two things to me: (1) schools are nowhere near as safe as has been represented up to now, and (2) parents are very -- very -- concerned with the lack of safety at our schools. The evidence is there and Mr. Pocock's experience of easy entry reported recently is far from an isolated incident, the testimony given at this meeting backing that up. Our schools are not secure and safe for kids and teachers. We are being lied to. Mr. Erardi, you're full of baloney with your caution to move slowly on improving security. You and your Board of Education darn well moved fast enough for the new high school playing field and for the renovation (and re-renovation) of the middle schools. Time to get your collective butts into the swing on this matter!
WhiskeyTangoFoxrot January 30, 2013 at 04:38 PM
I think we should take after North Branford Schools and put armed retired cops in the schools.
Arthur Cyr January 30, 2013 at 06:15 PM
This "implies" things to you? Just because someone "claims" they went to some unnamed school and entered three different doors while school was in session doesn't mean that actually happened. And "knee-jerk reactions" are for the people that want bullet proof glass installed NOW at all schools, metal detectors at all schools and armed police at all schools. Because nothing is too extreme or costly for their children. Because you're obviously not up to date on things, the climbing walls were removed from the middle schools renovation plans. There are plenty of public town and BOE meetings. If you went to this meeting, did you stand up and identify yourself and then call people liars? I think not. No integrity.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »